Section 127 of CGST Act, 2017 – Power to Impose Penalty in Certain Cases

-

Section 127 of CGST Act, 2017 – Power to Impose Penalty in Certain Cases

Act: Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Chapter: XIX – Offences and Penalties
Section Covered: Section 127
Effective From: 01st July 2017

🔎 Introduction

Section 127 of the CGST Act, 2017 empowers the proper officer to impose a penalty in cases where a person commits a contravention of the GST provisions for which no separate penalty has been specifically prescribed under the Act.

This provision acts as a residuary penalty mechanism, ensuring that every violation of the GST law can be addressed appropriately, even if it is not expressly covered by another penalty provision.

It should, however, be read together with Section 125 (General Penalty) and Section 126 (General Disciplines Related to Penalty), which require that penalties be imposed fairly, proportionately, and after following the principles of natural justice.

📜 Bare Provision – Section 127

Section 127 has been omitted by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01st October, 2023 (vide Notification No. 28/2023 – Central Tax dated 31.07.2023).

Prior to its omission, Section 127 empowered the proper officer to impose a penalty after giving the person an opportunity of being heard in specified situations.

Accordingly, Section 127 is no longer in force from 01.10.2023.

✅ Legislative History

ParticularDetails
Enacted01 July 2017
Omitted byFinance Act, 2023
Effective date of omission01 October 2023
Current StatusOmitted / No longer operative

📌 Why Was Section 127 Omitted?

The omission of Section 127 was part of the Government's initiative to:

✔ Simplify the GST law.

✔ Remove redundant provisions.

✔ Avoid overlap with other penalty provisions.

✔ Streamline penalty adjudication under the CGST Act.

After its omission, penalty proceedings are governed by the remaining applicable provisions such as Sections 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, and other relevant provisions of the Act.

✅ Meaning in Simple Words

Earlier, Section 127 dealt with the power of the proper officer to impose penalties in certain situations after following due process.

However, from 01 October 2023, this provision has been omitted.

Therefore:

  • No proceedings can now be initiated under Section 127.
  • Existing penalty matters are governed by the applicable provisions of the Act as amended.
  • Tax authorities must rely upon the relevant operative penalty provisions instead.

📖 Practical Illustration

Example 1 – Proceedings after 01.10.2023

A taxpayer commits a contravention in November 2025.

➡ The proper officer cannot invoke Section 127, as it has already been omitted.

Instead, the officer must examine whether the contravention falls under:

  • Section 122 (Specified offences),
  • Section 125 (General penalty), or
  • Any other applicable provision of the CGST Act.

Example 2 – Penalty for a Specific Offence

A registered person issues an invoice without actual supply of goods.

➡ Penalty will be imposed under Section 122, not under the omitted Section 127.

⚖️ Legal Position After Omission

The omission of Section 127 does not create a vacuum in the GST penalty framework.

The Act continues to contain detailed provisions dealing with:

  • Penalty for specified offences.
  • General penalty.
  • General principles for imposing penalty.
  • Waiver or reduction of penalty.

Thus, penalty proceedings continue under the remaining operative provisions.

🎯 Objective of the Amendment

The omission of Section 127 was intended to:

✔ Eliminate duplication in penalty provisions.

✔ Simplify the statutory framework.

✔ Improve ease of compliance.

✔ Ensure better clarity in penalty administration.

📌 Important Points to Remember

  • Section 127 stood omitted with effect from 01 October 2023.
  • It is no longer an operative provision of the CGST Act.
  • Penalties are now governed by other applicable provisions of the Act.
  • While studying GST law, always note the legislative amendments to avoid relying on omitted provisions.

🔄 Related Provisions

SectionParticulars
Section 122Penalty for certain offences
Section 123Penalty for failure to furnish information return
Section 124Fine for failure to furnish statistics
Section 125General penalty
Section 126General disciplines related to penalty
Section 127Omitted w.e.f. 01.10.2023
Section 128Power to waive penalty or fee

⚖️ Judicial Perspective

Since Section 127 has been omitted, recent judicial decisions primarily focus on the operative penalty provisions of the CGST Act.

Courts have consistently reiterated that:

  • Penalties must be imposed strictly in accordance with the statutory provisions.
  • Authorities must comply with the principles of natural justice.
  • Penalty provisions should be interpreted in light of the facts of each case and the legislative intent.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. Is Section 127 of the CGST Act still applicable?

No. It has been omitted with effect from 01 October 2023.

Q2. Which amendment omitted Section 127?

The Finance Act, 2023, made effective through Notification No. 28/2023 – Central Tax dated 31.07.2023.

Q3. Can a penalty now be imposed under Section 127?

No. Since the section has been omitted, penalties cannot be imposed under it.

Q4. Which provisions now govern penalties?

Depending on the nature of the contravention, Sections 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, and other applicable provisions govern penalty proceedings.

Q5. Does omission of Section 127 mean no penalty can be imposed?

No. Penalties continue to be imposed under the remaining operative provisions of the CGST Act.

Q6. Does the omission affect pending proceedings?

The effect on pending proceedings depends on the applicable saving provisions and the facts of each case. Such matters are generally governed by the amendment and the principles contained in the applicable law.

Q7. Why was Section 127 removed?

To simplify the GST penalty framework and remove redundant provisions.

Q8. Should taxpayers still study Section 127?

Yes. It is useful for understanding the legislative history of the CGST Act, but it should be noted that the provision is no longer in force.

Q9. What is the current status of Section 127?

It is an omitted provision and has no operative effect from 01.10.2023.

Q10. Why is it important to know about the omission?

Because relying on an omitted provision may lead to incorrect legal interpretation or advice.

📝 Conclusion

Section 127 of the CGST Act, 2017 originally formed part of the GST penalty framework but ceased to have effect from 01 October 2023 following its omission by the Finance Act, 2023. The legislative change was introduced to streamline the penalty provisions and eliminate unnecessary overlap within the Act.

Taxpayers, practitioners, and tax officers should therefore rely on the currently operative penalty provisions, particularly Sections 122, 125, 126, and 128, while dealing with GST penalty matters. Keeping track of such amendments is essential for accurate legal interpretation and effective GST compliance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Input Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Buyer Due to Supplier’s Bogus Billing & Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation – Legal Position, Case Laws & Remedies

-
Input Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Buyer Due to Supplier’s Bogus Billing & Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation – Legal Position, Case Laws & Remedies Introduction A recurring and high-stakes dispute under GST is denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to a genuine recipient merely because the supplier’s GST registration is cancelled retrospectively on allegations of bogus billing / fake invoicing. In many cases: The recipient purchased goods or availed services in the normal course of business Full payment including GST was made through banking channels ITC is reflected in GSTR-2A / GSTR-2B Later, the supplier’s registration is cancelled ab initio alleging fake billing The department issues a Show Cause Notice (SCN) proposing ITC reversal, interest and penalty This article explains: What the CGST Act, 2017 and Rules actually provide Whether ITC can be denied to a bona fide purchaser Supreme Court and High Court jurisprudence (in favour and against) Action steps to ...
Read more

Rate of GST on Works Contract Services w.e.f. 01 Jan 2022

-
  W.e.f. 01 st Jan 2022 the rate of GST on works contract services for specific contract provided to government authority and government entities will be changed.   Tax Rate On or Before 31.12.2021   1.       For Works Mentioned In Item(iii) And (vi) GST Rate Was 12% For Providing Services To Central Government/State Government/Union Territory/Local Authority/ Governmental Authority/ Govt Entity And 18% For Providing Services To Others.   2.       For Works Mentioned In Item (iv) ,(v) And (viii) GST Rate Was 12% For Providing Services To Any Body.     3.       For Works Mentioned In Item (vii) GST Rate Was 5% For Providing Services To Central Government/State Government/Local Authority/ Governmental Authority/ Govt Entity And 18% For Providing Services To Other.   The same is notified by the government vide notification no 11/2017, 20/2017, 24/2017 and 3...
Read more

Section 74 GST SCN That Only States Figures Without Allegations of Fraud/Suppression: Supreme Court Grants Stay

-
  Section 74 GST SCN That Only States Figures Without Allegations of Fraud/Suppression: Supreme Court Grants Stay Introduction The Supreme Court of India has intervened in a GST dispute, granting an interim stay on further proceedings arising from a GST Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 because the notice only contained numerical figures and did not set out specific allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts — the essential foundation for invoking Section 74. This decision clarifies that mere tabulation of figures without factual narrative is prima facie defective and unsustainable for the purposes of extended limitation and penalty under Section 74. What is Section 74 of the CGST Act? Section 74 deals with cases where: Tax has not been paid or has been short paid, Input Tax Credit (ITC) has been wrongly availed or utilised, “by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax...
Read more